When was lynching most common

Lynching in America argues that is a powerful statement about our failure to value the Black lives lost in this brutal campaign of racial violence. Research on mass violence, trauma, and transitional justice underscores the urgent need to engage in public conversations about racial history that begin a process of truth and reconciliation in this country.

It evolved. The most enduring evil of enslavement is the narrative of racial inferiority that defined Black people as less human than white people. This series follows the myth of racial difference and its legacy from enslavement to mass incarceration. Slavery in America documents the legacy of American slavery and the domestic slave trade in Montgomery. Reconstruction in America documents nearly 2, more confirmed racial terror lynchings of Black people by white mobs in America than previously detailed.

Segregation in America documents how millions of white Americans opposed civil rights and racial equality. Download PDF Purchase a copy. Explore the Lynching in America Website. In order to settle a razor-thin and contested presidential election between the Republican Rutherford B Hayes and the Democrat Samuel Tilden, northern Republicans agreed to withdraw federal troops from the last of the formerly renegade states. The move technically only affected South Carolina and Louisiana but symbolically gestured to the south that the north would no longer hold the former Confederacy to the promise of full citizenship for freed blacks, and the south jumped at the chance to renege on the pledge.

The end of Reconstruction ushered in a widespread campaign of racial terror and oppression against newly freed black Americans, of which lynching was a cornerstone. The vast majority of lynching participants were never punished, both because of the tacit approval of law enforcement, and because dozens if not hundreds often had a hand in the killing.

Still, punishment was not unheard of — though most of the time, if white lynchers were tried or convicted, it was for arson, rioting or some other much more minor offense. Lynchings slowed in the middle of the 20th century with the coming of the civil rights movement. Also playing a major role was the great migration of black people out of the south into urban areas north and west.

The exodus of some 6 million black Americans between and was pushed by racial terror and a waning agricultural economy and pulled by a surfeit of industrial job opportunities. The year was the first since people began keeping track that there were no recorded lynchings. The end of lynching cannot be said to be purely academic, though. While targeted violence against black people did not end with the lynching era, the element of public spectacle and open, even celebratory participation was a unique social phenomenon that would not be reborn in the same way as racial violence evolved.

Despite the shift, the specter of ritual black death as a public affair — one that people could confidently participate in without anonymity and that could be seen as entertainment — did not end with the lynching era. Generally speaking and especially early on, the white press wrote sympathetically about lynchings and their necessity to preserve order in the south.

The Memphis Evening Scimitar published in In the state of slavery he learned politeness from association with white people who took pains to teach him. Since the emancipation came and the tie of mutual interest and regard between master and servant was broken, the Negro has drifted away into a state which is neither freedom nor bondage ….

In consequence … there are many negroes who use every opportunity to make themselves offensive, particularly when they think it can be done with impunity ….

We have had too many instances right here in Memphis to doubt this, and our experience is not exceptional. The black press, on the other hand, was arguably the primary force in fighting against the phenomenon. The Memphis journalist Ida B Wells was the most strident and devoted anti-lynching advocate in US history, and spent a year-career writing, researching and speaking on the horrors of the practice. Mississippi was the state where most people were lynched in these years, with an estimated victims, 93 percent of whom were black.

Georgia saw the second most lynchings, with in total, and the share of black victims was also 93 percent. Compared to the nationwide average of 73 percent, the share of black victims in former-Confederate states was 86 percent. Texas was the only former-Confederate state where this share 71 percent was below the national average, due to the large number of Mexicans who were lynched there. Outside of the south Of the non-Confederate state with the highest number of lynching victims, most either bordered the former-Confederate states, or were to the west.

Generally speaking, the share of white victims in these states was often higher than in the south, meaning that the majority took place in the earlier years represented here; something often attributed to the lack of an established judiciary system in rural regions, and the demand for a speedy resolution.

However, there are many reports of black people being lynched in the former border states in the early th century, as they made their way northward during the Great Migration. Loading statistic Show source. Download for free You need to log in to download this statistic Register for free Already a member? Log in. Show detailed source information? Register for free Already a member?

More information. Supplementary notes. Other statistics on the topic. Aaron O'Neill. Research expert covering historical data. Profit from additional features with an Employee Account. Please create an employee account to be able to mark statistics as favorites.

Then you can access your favorite statistics via the star in the header. Profit from additional features by authenticating your Admin account.